Downloads:
1
Behavioural science interventions within the development and environmental fields in developing countries: An evidence gap map
Overview
The evidence review presented a systematic, multisectoral search of publications in the academic and grey literature. The searches were restricted to quantitative studies published between 2000 and 2022 that assessed the effectiveness of one or more behavioural science interventions using experimental and quasi-experimental designs. Although the evidence base was thin, the EGM revealed that the most commonly evaluated interventions were reminders, feedback, micro-incentives, salience of communication, commitment devices, salience of experience design (how individuals interact with their physical or digital environment), goal setting, rules of thumb, social norms and social benchmarking. There was limited evidence on wider interventions including planning prompts, group incentives, public commitments, framing devices, checklists, lotteries, defaults, interventions to reduce hassles, identity priming, anchoring, active choice and cognitive behavioural therapy interventions.Report Details
| Year Published | |
| Theme/s | |
| Joint | Yes |
| Partner/s | |
| SDG/s | |
| Agency Focal Point | Andreas Reumann |
| Focal Point Email | areumann@gcfund.org |
| Managed by Independent Evaluation Office | Yes |
Share:
Related
Member Publication
Downloads:
1
Member Publication
Downloads:
1
Member Publication
Downloads:
2
Member Publication
Downloads:
1
Member Publication
Downloads:
1
Member Publication
Downloads:
1
Member Publication
Downloads:
1
YOU 'RE READING
Behavioural science interventions within the development and environmental fields in developing countries: An evidence gap map
